Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 58,908 of 59,235    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
|    30 Dec 25 21:34:18    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 30/12/2025 20:59, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 12/30/25 3:35 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 12/30/2025 2:22 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       >>> On 30/12/2025 14:32, olcott wrote:       >>>       >>>> G := (F ⊬ G)       >>>> a sequence of inference steps in F from the axioms       >>>> of F that assert that they themselves do not exist in F.       >>>       >>> You suppose that's what the symbols mean. Yet you know that supposition       >>> is inadmissible per-Se. Cognitive dissonance in action.       >>>       >>       >> The symbols *mean* a self-contradictory expression of language       >> the same sort of thing as: "this sentence is not true".       >       > But it doesn't, as it is satisfiable by a statement that is true but       > unprovable, which just mean the statement is established true by an       > infinite chain of infernce              Are you using a finite derivation in the meta-system of the limit of a       converging sequence of finite derivations of increasing length (whose       terminals may or may not be the statement being proved but the limit of       whose terminals /is/)?              And thus you say the statement is true thereby exemplifying a point from       which we may inductively infer a meaning for "true"? Is that "true of       the system in the meta-system" ?              --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca