Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 58,948 of 59,235    |
|    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to olcott    |
|    Re: Key difference between math and the     |
|    03 Jan 26 22:20:03    |
      XPost: sci.math, sci.logic, comp.theory       XPost: sci.lang       From: PointedEars@web.de              olcott wrote:       > On 1/2/2026 4:30 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:       >> olcott wrote:       >>> The philosophy of math says maybe we have       >>> been thinking about this stuff all wrong.       >>       >> Says who, you?       >>       >> Mathematics is an exact structural _science_; hence "*sci*.math".       >>       >>> Math says of course we haven't been thinking       >>> about this stuff all wrong everyone knows       >>> that math is infallible.       >>       >> /Ex nonsenso quodlibet./       >>       >> Why do you write about things that you know nothing about?       >       > "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       > is fully computable entirely on the basis of finite       > string manipulation rules applied to finite strings.              Pseudoscientific word salad.              Again: Why do you write about things that you know nothing about?              > In the philosophy of mathematics, formalism is the       > view that holds that statements of mathematics       > and logic can be considered to be statements about       > the consequences of the manipulation of strings       > (alphanumeric sequences of symbols, usually as       > equations) using established manipulation rules.       >       > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism_(philosophy_of_mathematics)              That does not confirm your initial claim.              Also, it should be noted that "the philosophy of (i.e. *about*) mathematics"       is apparently a questionable concept to begin with, as one can see by the       marker of "multiple issues" if one follows the link in that Wikipedia article.              You would do well to not continue this mindbogglingly stupid crosspost       across 5 (!) newsgroups (F'up2 sci.math set), and to post to Usenet using       your real name.              But given your record, probably you are just trolling again.              --       PointedEars              Twitter: @PointedEars2       Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca