XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.lang   
   XPost: sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/11/2026 8:39 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > On 11/01/2026 11:31, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>> Not one person from any field or combination of   
   >>> fields has presented any formal resolution of   
   >>> the Liar Paradox that has been officially accepted.   
   >>> Did you know that?   
   >>   
   >> WRONG.   
   >   
   > What does "officially accepted" mean? His Majesty's crown court has   
   > found that the resolution is so with prejudice? His Majesty's memoirs   
   > "My Liar Paradox and I" has the resolution in it? His Majesty published   
   > a decree in The London Gazette?   
   >   
   > You have to pay 500% attention to the actual words Olcott actually uses.   
   >   
      
   Basically a broad consensus of conventional wisdom   
   agrees that the Liar Paradox is an open question   
   that has never been resolved.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2026 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)