Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 59,024 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to olcott    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
|    14 Jan 26 16:11:16    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       XPost: sci.lang       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 1/14/2026 3:36 PM, olcott wrote:       > Interpreting incompleteness as a gap between mathematical truth and       > proof depends on truth-conditional semantics; once this is replaced by       > proof-theoretic semantics a framework not yet sufficiently developed at       > the time of Gödel’s proof the notion of such a gap becomes unfounded.       >              Gödel and Turing incompleteness results expose the limits of       denotational and truth-conditional semantics, not limits of proof or       computation per se. When meaning is grounded operationally or       proof-theoretically, the problematic self-referential constructions are       rejected as semantically unfounded rather than treated as determinate       but unknowable facts.              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca