XPost: comp.theory, comp.software-eng   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/16/2026 4:21 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   > On 1/16/26 8:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >> On 1/16/26 4:08 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>> On 1/15/26 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/15/26 7:23 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> bro stick a giant dildo up ur asshole u hypocritical fuckface...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> when i tried to suggest improvements to the computational model,   
   >>>>> like RTMs, u then told me i *can't* do that because muh ct-thesis,   
   >>>>> and here u are crying about how no superior method has been found   
   >>>>> as if u'd ever even tried to look past the ct-thesis...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No, you didn't suggest improvements to the model, you just showed   
   >>>> you don't knoww what that means.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You don't get to change what a "computation" is, that isn't part of   
   >>>> the "model".   
   >>>   
   >>> you honestly could have just said that cause the rest of this is just   
   >>> u repeating urself as if that makes it more correct   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> But I HAVE said it that simply, and you rejected it as you think you   
   >> get to,   
   >   
   > but repeating urself doesn't make it more true   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The model would be the format of the machine, and while your RTM   
   >>>> might be a type of machine that could be thought of, they don't do   
   >>>> COMPUTATIONS, as it violates the basic rules of what a compuation IS.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Computations are specific algorithms acting on just the input data.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> A fundamental property needed to reach at least Turing Complete   
   >>>> ability, is the ability to cascade algorithms.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Your RTM break that capability, and thus become less than Turing   
   >>>> Complete.   
   >>>   
   >>> i'm sorry, RTMs are literally just TMs with one added instruction   
   >>> that dumps static meta-data + copies tape ... how have they *lost*   
   >>> power with that??? clearly they can express anything that TMs can ...   
   >>   
   >> Which means you don't understand how "TM"s work, as they don't have   
   >> that sort of "instructions".   
   >   
   > fuck dude sorry "operation" is the term turing used, i added to the list   
   > of possible operations with RTMs, my god dude...   
   >   
   > see how fucking unhelpful u are???   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And, any algorithm that actually USES their capability to detect if   
   >>>> they have been nested will become incorrect as a decider, as a   
   >>>> decider is a machine that computes a specific mapping of its input   
   >>>> to its output, and if that result changes in the submachine, only   
   >>>> one of the answers it gives (as a stand-alone, or as the sub-   
   >>>> machine) can be right, so you just show that it gave a wrong answer.   
   >>>   
   >>> u have proof that doesn't work yet you keep asserting this is the   
   >>> "one true way". seems like u just enjoy shooting urself in the foot,   
   >>> with the only actual rational way being it's just the "one true way"   
   >>   
   >> IT IS DEFINITION. Something you don't seem to understand.   
   >>   
   >> "Computation" is NOT defined by what some machine does, that is   
   >> algorithms and results. "Computation" is the mapping generated by it,   
   >> which MUST be a specific mapping of input to output.   
   >   
   > no one has defined "computation" well enough to prove that turing   
   > machines can compute them all,   
   >   
      
   Computation only applies finite string   
   transformation rules to finite string inputs.   
      
   Deciders transform finite string inputs by   
   finite string transformation rules into   
   {Accept, Reject} values.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2026 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)