Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 59,141 of 59,235    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
|    20 Jan 26 23:08:00    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 18/01/2026 23:41, olcott wrote:              > I already just said that the proof and refutation of       > Goldbach are outside the scope of PA axioms.              So Richard is right that you need a truth value for not being covered:              True(S, Goldbach) = OutOfScope              or a type theory to give True(S, Goldbach) no content when Goldbach is       out of scope, or keep it explicit with an InScope(S, P) family of       propositions. Of course, the type theory approach is often easier to use       with pencil and paper.              Is there a conventional alternative to implication for an explicit       alternative of type theory?              Unsatisfying: WhenInScope(S, P) -> (True(S, P) & Foo(P))       More satisfying: WhenInScope(S,P,Q in (True(S,Q) & Foo(Q)))              Hey, I see that in prolog often. Q is an indeterminate (unbound variable       in prolog) bound by WhenInScope(S,P,Q in ...) within "...".              or a lambda expression alternative:              WhenInScope(S,P,λQ.True(S,Q) & Foo(Q))              I prefer that over an implicit, semi-ad-hoc type theory.              Are there conventional names for these ideas and an author and excellent       exposition textbook?              --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca