home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.ai.philosophy      Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this      59,235 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 59,141 of 59,235   
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   
   20 Jan 26 23:08:00   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 18/01/2026 23:41, olcott wrote:   
      
   > I already just said that the proof and refutation of   
   > Goldbach are outside the scope of PA axioms.   
      
   So Richard is right that you need a truth value for not being covered:   
      
   True(S, Goldbach) = OutOfScope   
      
   or a type theory to give True(S, Goldbach) no content when Goldbach is   
   out of scope, or keep it explicit with an InScope(S, P) family of   
   propositions. Of course, the type theory approach is often easier to use   
   with pencil and paper.   
      
   Is there a conventional alternative to implication for an explicit   
   alternative of type theory?   
      
   Unsatisfying: WhenInScope(S, P) -> (True(S, P) & Foo(P))   
   More satisfying: WhenInScope(S,P,Q in (True(S,Q) & Foo(Q)))   
      
   Hey, I see that in prolog often. Q is an indeterminate (unbound variable   
   in prolog) bound by WhenInScope(S,P,Q in ...) within "...".   
      
   or a lambda expression alternative:   
      
   WhenInScope(S,P,λQ.True(S,Q) & Foo(Q))   
      
   I prefer that over an implicit, semi-ad-hoc type theory.   
      
   Are there conventional names for these ideas and an author and excellent   
   exposition textbook?   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca