Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 59,234 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to All    |
|    Making all knowledge expressed in langua    |
|    12 Feb 26 19:32:26    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       XPost: sci.lang       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 2/11/2026 2:43 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:       > On 2026-02-10 21:59, olcott wrote:       >> We completely replace the foundation of truth conditional       >> semantics with proof theoretic semantics. Then expressions       >> are "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       >> only to the extent that all their meaning comes from       >> inferential relations to other expressions of that language.       >> This is a purely linguistic PTS notion of truth with no       >> connections outside the inferential system.       >>       >> Well-founded proof-theoretic semantics reject expressions       >> lacking a "well-founded justification tree" as meaningless.       >> ∀x (~Provable(T, x) ⇔ Meaningless(T, x))       >       > Proof-theoretic semantics makes no such claim.       > That's your claim and you       > should stop attributing it to others.       >       > André       >              I merely consolidated the essence of the current       field into a pair of axioms.              (Schroeder-Heister, 2024) "Proof-Theoretic Semantics"       ∀x (Provable(T, x) ⇔ Meaningful(T, x))              Proof-theoretic semantics is inherently inferential,       as it is inferential activity which manifests itself       in proofs...              inferences and the rules of inference establish       the meaning of expressions              https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/#InfeIntuAntiReal                     (Prawitz, 2012) "Truth as an Epistemic Notion"       ∀x (Provable(x) ⇒ True(x))       What is the appropriate notion of truth for sentences       whose meanings are understood in epistemic terms such       as proof or ground for an assertion?              It seems that the truth of such sentences has to       be identified with the existence of proofs or grounds...              https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9107-6                     --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca