Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,640 of 131,241    |
|    Thomas Koenig to All    |
|    A new method for OoO    |
|    10 Sep 25 15:15:10    |
      From: tkoenig@netcologne.de              https://old.chipsandcheese.com/2025/08/29/condors-cuzco-risc-v-c       re-at-hot-chips-2025/       has an interestig take on how to do OoO (quite patented,       apparently). Apparently, they predict how many cycles their       instructions are going to take, and replay if that doesn't work       (for example in case of an L1 cache miss).              Sounds interesting, I wonder what people here think of it.              This made me wonder about the number of cycles cache reads for the       different levels take on CPUs with variable frequency. Do modern       CPU use fewer cycles to access, for example, L2, when the frequency       is lower?       --       This USENET posting was made without artificial intelligence,       artificial impertinence, artificial arrogance, artificial stupidity,       artificial flavorings or artificial colorants.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca