Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,646 of 131,241    |
|    Stefan Monnier to All    |
|    Slowing down non-critical paths    |
|    11 Sep 25 12:12:26    |
      From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca              The notion that some paths are critical (and those determine the       frequency that can be used) implies that there are paths which are not       critical, because they're much shorter, e.g. the low-bits of an addition       don't need to wait for the carry-propagation, so they're typically ready       long before the end of the cycle.              Do CPUs try and save power by making those paths slower (using lower       voltage, or slower and less power-hungry transistors)?                      Stefan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca