From: cr88192@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/11/2025 10:06 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:   
   > Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=  writes:   
   >> On Sat, 06 Sep 2025 16:21:12 GMT, MitchAlsup wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> No it does not sound "good" on a system that accurately reproduces   
   >>> 22KHz; like systems with electrostatic speakers covering the high end of   
   >>> the audio spectrum.   
   >>   
   >> I wonder how that works, given that the audio engineer that mastered the   
   >> recording was using speakers that cost a fraction of the price.   
   >   
   > Have you priced quality studio monitors?   Obviously not.   
   >   
   > A nice pair of intro electrostatics run about a USD1200 (magnapan lrs+).   
   >   
   > A single studio monitor can easily cost more than USD12000.   
   >   
      
   I guess, this is a fair bit different, say, from using some $35   
   headphones, or $60 for some external speakers, probably throwing some   
   money Logitech's way...   
      
   Or, slightly cheaper, some "Amazon Basics" equivalents.   
   Or, more expensive, throwing their money at Bosch or Senheiser or similar.   
      
      
   Granted, there are cheaper headphones, but they are often lacking in   
   terms of comfort and/or audio quality.   
      
      
   Otherwise, I would think an option would be to try to guess which sort   
   of hardware consumers are most likely to be using, and then tune for   
   best results on this (so, say, aim for cheap, but not too cheap).   
      
   ...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)