From: quadibloc@invalid.invalid   
      
   On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:54:12 +0000, John Savard wrote:   
      
   > Although it's called "inverse hyperthreading", this technique could be   
   > combined with SMT - put the chunks into different threads on the same   
   > core, rather than on different cores, and then one wouldn't need to add   
   > extra connections between cores to make it work.   
      
   On further reflection, this may be equivalent to re-inventing out-of-order   
   execution.   
      
   John Savard   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)