Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,766 of 131,241    |
|    BGB to Michael S    |
|    Re: Intel's Software Defined Super Cores    |
|    26 Sep 25 15:23:38    |
      [continued from previous message]              adjust the duty cycle as needed to maintain the target voltage.              MOSFET lets power in, which goes through the coil, and charges the       capacitor (in parallel with the load). When the MOSFET turns off, there       is a voltage kick from the inductor (it goes negative), pulling power       from the ground plane.                     It is possible to use an opamp for this (rather than a microcontoller),       but an opamp would generate very crude PWM, thus, noisier.              Possible noise reduction approaches:        Big capacitor;        Secondary inductor, diode, and capacitor.       Assuming a constant load, a second inductor could smooth the PWM noise       by maintaining closer to a constant current; but is more likely to see       voltage ripples if there are sudden changes in the load (if compared       with using a bigger capacitor).              Comparably a microcontroller can generate an higher-frequency PWM       signal, and keep the initial noise lower.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca