Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,882 of 131,241    |
|    Anton Ertl to Scott Lurndal    |
|    Re: Linus Torvalds on bad architectural     |
|    10 Oct 25 08:30:03    |
      From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at              scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:       >The only benefit in modern days for big-endian is that network       >protocols are in big-endian form. Not a big issue with modern       >LE CPUs, where byteswap is a single cycle instruction.              Clever architects put the byte swap it in the load and store       instructions, where the byte-swapping is just an addition to the       handling of misaligned loads and stores, which itself is an addition       to the handling of smaller-than-transfer-width accesses. PowerPC has       such instructions.              - anton       --       'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.'        Mitch Alsup, |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca