Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130,375 of 131,241    |
|    John Savard to John Savard    |
|    Re: Why no roundTiesToOdd in IEEE?    |
|    28 Nov 25 05:27:42    |
      From: quadibloc@invalid.invalid              On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 05:19:31 +0000, John Savard wrote:              > But I think I'd have to learn more about numerical analysis to make an       > intelligent comment on this matter.              I had thought that rounding ties to even would result in the correct       rounding for a reduced precision... if the precision were reduced only by       one bit, which is a case that does not occur in practice.              But now I've found another Wikipedia article which clarified things for       me. It turns out that rounding ties to odd does have one important       benefit. It means that the rounding of ties, at least, will never result       in the exponent of the result changing.              Since rounding to nearest when it isn't a tie can still change the       exponent, it's not clear to me that this is all that important. Rounding       to even or to odd both have the virtue of avoiding bias, of course.              John Savard              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca