Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.arch    |    Apparently more than just beeps & boops    |    131,241 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130,775 of 131,241    |
|    EricP to Anton Ertl    |
|    Re: floating point history, word order a    |
|    05 Jan 26 11:05:41    |
      From: ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com              Anton Ertl wrote:       > anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:       >> For multiplication, one common operation is to multiply a price with a       >> number of pieces resulting in a price, and no rescaling is necessary       >> there. Another common operation is to compute a percentage; you do       >> have rescaling there.       >       > One interesting aspect is that the interest rates I have seen are       > multiples of 1/800 (e.g., 1 3/4%=7/4%=14/8%=14/800). One can also       > represent these through decimal scales, but the decimal scale that       > allows to represent them is 1/100000 (1/800=125/100000). It may be       > more economical in bits to scale with 1/800 (or maybe 1/1600 to be       > prepared the next innovation in finance).       >       > For tax rates, IIRC I have also seen half percentages, so using a       > 1/800 or 1/1600 scale factor may be a good idea for them, too.       >       > - anton              I don't know about the 800 but stock and bond prices used to be       published with fractions like 17 1/8. I can't remember when they       switched to publishing in decimal.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca