From: jgd@cix.co.uk   
      
   In article <20260107133424.00000e99@yahoo.com>, already5chosen@yahoo.com   
   (Michael S) wrote:   
      
   > I already asked you couple of years ago how fast do want binary128   
   > in order to consider it fast enough.   
   > IIRC, you either avoided the answer completely or gave totally   
   > unrealistic answer like "the same as binary64".   
   > May be, nobody bites because with non-answers or answers like that   
   > nobody thinks that you are serious?   
      
   I don't know much about hardware design. What is realistic for hardware   
   binary128?   
      
   John   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)