From: already5chosen@yahoo.com   
      
   On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 09:17:11 -0000 (UTC)   
   Thomas Koenig  wrote:   
      
   > Michael S  schrieb:   
   > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 00:33:15 -0000 (UTC)   
   > > Thomas Koenig  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Michael S  schrieb:   
   > >>   
   > >> > I had above-zero success rate with gcc bug reports related to   
   > >> > compiler pessimization. May be, 10%. May be even 15%. I didn't   
   > >> > really count.   
   > >>   
   > >> The case in point appears to be a regression, which are supposed   
   > >> to be fixed, and receive much higher attention than "normal" bugs.   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > According to my experience, it could receive higher attention than   
   > > average pessimization case, but there is close to zero chance   
   > > that it would be fixed at the end.   
   > > The typical scenario for such cases is that they "fall between   
   > > chairs" of tree optimization and target code generation and neither   
   > > party  is taking responsibility.   
   >   
   > Do you have an example?   
      
   Here is a good example   
   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617   
   By chance, it is remotely related to Anton's case.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)