From: nowhere@never.at   
      
   Kerr Mudd-John wrote:   
      
   >> seems I played this game for too long...   
   >> my brain works still on it even when I sleep :)   
      
   >> Terje asked for another 2:1 algo:   
   >> I gave up on the hex idea because of the sub 07 and the missing   
   >> first/second indicator, but why not use the given ranges a bit   
   >> different ?   
   >> So a 4+4 bit algo may use the low nibble of "A...P" (41..50) to   
   >> produce 10..f0 (00 with 50) by shl,4 from first byte and 01..0f   
   >> of "a..p"(61..70) by AND&OR from every second byte.   
      
   >> in addition I made use of many filler bytes to modify alot:   
      
   >> ZRRh61XPR560PRR4dPjDa-rY1G`Ss$anytext#<=t7r4> 66hwAX(G%(g/(G3(g8(g9(G0)G1(g:eeee+++   
      
   >> it didn't become shorter than the xor-sub-sub would show with my   
   >> extended use of printable characters. Just an idea   
      
   > Glad to see you're sleeping well!   
      
   at least I'm not tired when I wake up after dreaming well :)   
      
   > Lots of fixups in there; well done on using the jmp space!   
      
   I also tried to replace the two nops right after the CRLF with:   
   dec bx |dec bx                                    ;,   
   and then adjust already 'slid' [bx+..] modifications for the second   
   line followed by pop bx | push bx.   
   It works too, but it isn't any shorter.   
   __   
   wolfgang   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)