Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,703 of 4,675    |
|    NimbUs to All    |
|    Re: interfacing ASM (ia-32) with GNU g77    |
|    24 Jun 17 14:46:28    |
      From: nimbus@nospicedham.XXX.invalid              Rod Pemberton dit dans news:oikce4$tqm$2@gioia.aioe.org:                     > What about NASM/FASM? ...              Re. FASM, which i have used sometimes in special situations       (for the ease it provides in writing programs that mix and       switch real/protected modes) If I recall correctly, FASM does       not output "object modules" in the conventional sense, rather       producing executable programs in one runn. BICBW.       > http://www.nasm.us/       > https://flatassembler.net/              Now attempting to ask FASM's web forum...              I haven't had NASM ever, hasn't that been long outdated ? and       specifically, isn't FASM considered a better NASM replacement,       sorta ?              --       NimbUs              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca