From: fbkotler@nospicedham.myfairpoint.net   
      
   NimbUs wrote:   
   > I haven't had NASM ever, hasn't that been long outdated ? and   
   > specifically, isn't FASM considered a better NASM replacement,   
   > sorta ?   
      
   No, Nasm is quite up-to-date. Fasm is also a fine assembler. The   
   differences are mostly fairly minor. Fasm's forum is better. If you ask   
   on the Nasm forum, you'll probably get an answer from me... or not at all...   
      
   I do have some code from back in the days when the forum was on   
   SourceForge. It links against "gfortran" - no "77". Much like linking   
   against C. ("gcc" is the "gnu compiler collection" and "gfortran" is one   
   of the compilers - other implementations may differ). I can post it if   
   you want, but I doubt if it'll be much help...   
      
   Best,   
   Frank   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)