From: nimbus@nospicedham.XXX.invalid   
      
   Melzzzzz wrote in news:oim8qq$m4q$1@news.albasani.net:   
   >> Rod Pemberton dit dans news:oikce4$tqm$2@gioia.aioe.org:   
   >>> What about NASM/FASM? ...   
      
   Melzzzzz, Rod, @Others who pointed to NASM : thank you All !   
   It is indeed a fine assembler and well suited to the job.   
   Plus, I think adapting my already coded finctions from TASM to   
   the NASM idiom.   
      
   >> I haven't had NASM ever, hasn't that been long outdated ?   
   and   
   >> specifically, isn't FASM considered a better NASM   
   replacement,   
   >> sorta ?   
      
   > Nope. nasm usually gets features before fasm. eg currently   
   nasm supports   
   > x32 Linux binaries fasm don't. Also nasm had avx512 support   
   before fasm.   
      
   And for the task at hand, it has the enormous advantage of   
   generating objects in the Coff format that my platform Fortran   
   wants !   
      
   Thanks...   
      
   --   
   NimbUs   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)