From: nowhere@never.at   
      
   Kerr Mudd-John wrote:   
      
   >> here we go:   
   >> I could have reached my estimated 206 byte, but can't pair all without   
   >> having 0x22 in there, so thanks to your short b64 decoder we are down   
   >> to 180+29=209 bytes for now (tested).   
      
   >> YQQj/hbxXP5byPQQ4~PjQaSW-s^1GXSs!$<$u]%> 664+(w!)W%)W*)W,0w?0G}ffff(Vj(Vl(Vn(fr)Vs(Vu(fx(vy(Vz)V|)V~eee$$   
   >> <+r(<=uc;,Asl|E<3wl(E~x<|rd,hAAO95Yj%G$Yht6#MJ   
   >> tAm6CAHNIcNIZWxsbyB3b3JsZCEk=   
      
   > Great stuff; and you even got my initials in there, thanks!   
      
   I'm not guilty on the ending "MJ", just coincident d1eb+7862=4a4d :)   
      
   But when I now count what we got:   
   your 44 byte decoder (47 if below command line), plus 16*3 byte for   
   modification... I start thinking about to use Terje's 2:1 again and   
   perhaps see a few bytes less then.   
   __   
   wolfgang   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)