From: notsaying@nospicedham.invalid.org   
      
   "wolfgang kern"  wrote in news:okf7ri$cn$1   
   @gioia.aioe.org:   
      
   >   
   > Kerr Mudd-John wrote:   
   >   
   >>> here we go:   
   >>> I could have reached my estimated 206 byte, but can't pair all without   
   >>> having 0x22 in there, so thanks to your short b64 decoder we are down   
   >>> to 180+29=209 bytes for now (tested).   
   >   
   >>> YQQj/hbxXP5byPQQ4~PjQaSW-s^1GXSs!$<$u]%>> 664+(w!)W%)W*)W,0w?0G}ffff(Vj(Vl(Vn(fr)Vs(Vu(fx(vy(Vz)V|)V~eee$$   
   >>> <+r(<=uc;,Asl|E<3wl(E~x<|rd,hAAO95Yj%G$Yht6#MJ   
   >>> tAm6CAHNIcNIZWxsbyB3b3JsZCEk=   
   >   
   >> Great stuff; and you even got my initials in there, thanks!   
   >   
   > I'm not guilty on the ending "MJ", just coincident d1eb+7862=4a4d :)   
   >   
   > But when I now count what we got:   
   > your 44 byte decoder (47 if below command line), plus 16*3 byte for   
   > modification... I start thinking about to use Terje's 2:1 again and   
   > perhaps see a few bytes less then.   
      
   That's the thing I keep my eye on the most; I'm a bit relucant to use all   
   those SMC fixups. (And I'm very keen to keep to pure B64!)   
      
      
   > __   
   > wolfgang   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)