Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,878 of 4,675    |
|    Martin Str|mberg to James Harris    |
|    Re: Look back to "just for the H@ck"    |
|    20 Jul 17 12:59:06    |
   
   From: ams@nospicedham.ludd.luth.se   
      
   James Harris wrote:   
   > If I had a go at it I'd be itching to add some of my own. Things like   
      
   > * A subsequent run from the start must also work.   
      
   What does this mean?   
      
   > * Not rely on [SP] being zero - in case of non-compliant environment. (I   
   > haven't found the .COM spec but from what people have said I guess that   
   > that 16-bit word is supposed to be zero ... perhaps so that a near   
   > return gets to CS:0 which is termination code.)   
      
   What SP points at is guaranteed to be 0 for a DOS .COM program.   
      
      
   --   
   MartinS   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca