Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,929 of 4,675    |
|    wolfgang kern to John    |
|    Re: Look back to "just for the H@ck"    |
|    17 Aug 17 10:24:32    |
      From: nowhere@never.at              Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:       [..]       > B64 216 bytes, ll63       > ZRRj=hZhXP5ZiPRR4wPj9aSH5q+1GuA0O+0O80g387z9F84uC07pIu=Sajq0fa=       > 660FW0Fv4r0Fg0Ft1FbhghX1FH1FJ1FN1FU0FX0fe0Fp0G34g666eeee       > h=+hr5==ht2=ahreDaDAyjlE=3hwapNcAHHAA666L/40MGVOQX4o4gudOPYPqM       > tAm6CAHNIcNIZWxsbyB3b3JsZCEk=              very good, and now you confirmed that SMC may be shorter than 2:1,       and it's already pretty close to 214(209)! :)              is there any reason for the two first lines show different size ?       I mean other than visual separation of blocks.              It works here but it may not work on other machines because you modify       012b,0133,0138 within the same cache-line without a branch.              I can't catch why: 012a jpe +7 ;wouldn't jz +7 do it as well ?       __       wolfgang              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca