From: notsaying@nospicedham.invalid.org   
      
   "wolfgang kern"  wrote in   
   news:on49uh$1ueo$1@gioia.aioe.org:   
      
   > Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:   
   > [..]   
   >>>> B64 216 bytes, ll63   
   >>>> ZRRj=hZhXP5ZiPRR4wPj9aSH5q+1GuA0O+0O80g387z9F84uC07pIu=Sajq0fa=   
   >>>> 660FW0Fv4r0Fg0Ft1FbhghX1FH1FJ1FN1FU0FX0fe0Fp0G34g666eeee   
   >>>> h=+hr5==ht2=ahreDaDAyjlE=3hwapNcAHHAA666L/40MGVOQX4o4gudOPYPqM   
   >>>> tAm6CAHNIcNIZWxsbyB3b3JsZCEk=   
   >   
   >>> very good, and now you confirmed that SMC may be shorter than 2:1,   
   >>> and it's already pretty close to 214(209)! :)   
   >   
   >>> is there any reason for the two first lines show different size ?   
   >>> I mean other than visual separation of blocks.   
   >   
   >> Yes, I was unable to fit in an "ignore crlf" step earlier; I need the   
   >> B64decoder to be contiguous.   
   >   
   > Me too tried such help before the 214/209 variants.   
   > I missed that you dont check for and skip <2B anymore.   
      
   Now (at last!) with crlf skipping:   
      
   217 bytes ll63   
      
   ZRRj=hAUXP5ATPRR4wPj8aSH5q+1GvA0O=0g60GqRF84rFwD270W/6pNIu9FSa=   
   660fa0FV0Fu4r1Fb0Fg0FsXjq1FG1FI1FM1FT0FW0fe0Fo4AMMM66eeeeU=+Ur5   
   ==Ut2=aUrCyGyAyLQE=3UwGMNEAHHAAO666L/40pGVQX4o4guBOPYPqMtAm6CAH   
   NIcNIZWxsbyB3b3JsZCEk=   
      
   (I dropped that over-complicated search flag to use SMC, but the numbers   
   are quite fragile!)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)