On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:58:28 -0500, Rod Pemberton   
    wrote:   
   >...   
   > Especially do I assume the maximum number correct?   
   > [snip]   
   >   
   >What maximum number?  What are you asking?   
   >   
   >Are you asking if another 64-bit palindromic number in decimal, say   
   >9876543210123456789, is larger than 1234567890987654321?  If so, that's   
   >obvious.  Wouldn't the largest 64-bit palindromic number be   
   >9999999999999999999?  Or, are you asking something else? ...   
   >   
   The Reciprocal is tailored to give a 64-bit quotient in RDX without   
   having to shift it to the right, but that limits the input value.   
      
   I think it should be 2,305,843,009,213,693,951 (2^61-1).  It is stated   
   in the text that it can be higher, but that number should be the   
   maximum it sure works with (Except when I misunderstood something,   
   which I'm not sure of, and that is the question).   
   --   
   aen   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)