Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,157 of 4,675    |
|    Rod Pemberton to aen@nospicedham.spamtrap.com    |
|    Re: Palindromic number    |
|    06 Dec 17 17:58:28    |
      From: EmailNullFile@nospicedham.voenflacbe.cpm              On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:24:17 GMT       aen@nospicedham.spamtrap.com wrote:              > [snip]       >       > Especially do I assume the maximum number correct?       > [snip]              What maximum number? What are you asking?              Are you asking if another 64-bit palindromic number in decimal, say       9876543210123456789, is larger than 1234567890987654321? If so, that's       obvious. Wouldn't the largest 64-bit palindromic number be       9999999999999999999? Or, are you asking something else? ...                     Rod Pemberton       --       North Korea is the proof that Soviet Russia and Communist China were       wrong.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca