home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.asm.x86      Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly      4,675 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,157 of 4,675   
   Rod Pemberton to aen@nospicedham.spamtrap.com   
   Re: Palindromic number   
   06 Dec 17 17:58:28   
   
   From: EmailNullFile@nospicedham.voenflacbe.cpm   
      
   On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:24:17 GMT   
   aen@nospicedham.spamtrap.com wrote:   
      
   > [snip]   
   >   
   > Especially do I assume the maximum number correct?   
   > [snip]   
      
   What maximum number?  What are you asking?   
      
   Are you asking if another 64-bit palindromic number in decimal, say   
   9876543210123456789, is larger than 1234567890987654321?  If so, that's   
   obvious.  Wouldn't the largest 64-bit palindromic number be   
   9999999999999999999?  Or, are you asking something else? ...   
      
      
   Rod Pemberton   
   --   
   North Korea is the proof that Soviet Russia and Communist China were   
   wrong.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca