Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,265 of 4,675    |
|    wolfgang kern to John    |
|    Re: Hex to bin    |
|    06 Feb 18 00:16:33    |
      From: nowhere@never.at              Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:              >>>> when once everyone got such a tiny tool we could share binaries       >>>> of any size either RM or PM or LM.       ...       >> Such TEXT2BIN and BIN2TEXT converters would work with any x86 OS and       >> may just need an assembler to built it. It doesn't need much, so it       >> could be inlined as well.       []       > Not really; you need to be able to write to file, IMO, and this means DOS       > int 21 or linux int 80              Everyone could make his/her prefered tool, to convert a string inbetween two       quote marks into code bytes.              >> a 5:4 BIN2TEXT encoder takes four bytes from source and make five       >> printable characters out of it.       >> ie: (my suggestion)       >> the binaries are converted into characters 0x23..0x78 only.              > I've gone with the "standard" set starting at 0x21; your method avoids       > double quotes but not single (or pipe symbols <>|). To substitute awkward       > ones, costs me erm - too many bytes!              you see a problem with "<>|" ? aren't these only seen in replies ?       But yes, any origin post should avoid it as long they aren't part of code,       that's why I suggested Quotemarks (0x22) as always visible delimiters.              > I have something that's close to working in 6 lines; it has the usual pre-       > amble to set registers with a popa, my usual copy to early PSP, and markup       > and execute; the routine copied is the 5:4 decoder, this then decodes the       > fileio routine which itself calls the decoder in PSP.       > It could probably be done much more easily using 32bit registers.                     My idea wasn't about an immediate implied conversion, my intention was to give       us (text only users) a chance to share code snips.       Yes, the whole idea behind is based on x86 32 bit at least.       And the decoder part may become just a short loop.       __       wolfgang              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca