Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,295 of 4,675    |
|    Frank Tetzel to All    |
|    Re: Does using LEA in stead of (I)MUL st    |
|    07 Mar 18 01:01:19    |
      From: s1445051@nospicedham.mail.zih.tu-dresden.de              > In this day and age, does it still make sense to use things like       >       > LEA EAX, [EAX + EAX * 4]       > ADD EAX, EAX       >       > rather than       >       > IMUL EAX, 10              One easy way to find out: ask your compiler!       https://godbolt.org/g/XLgURC              It depends on the CPU. Multiplication got way better, but multiplying       by a small constant is still done with LEA.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca