From: notsaying@nospicedham.invalid.org   
      
   On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:57:47 GMT, "Kerr-Mudd,John"   
    wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:15:43 GMT, "wolfgang kern"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>> Criticisms welcome:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, a LUT would be overkill. A bit reordering and CMOVcc, SETcc   
   >> could save some jumps.   
   > Actually, it's OK   
   >   
   []   
   > addnums:   
   > 161D:01D1 01 C8          add          ax,cx   
   > 161D:01D3 C3             ret   
   > 161D:01D4 29 C8          sub          ax,cx   
   > 161D:01D6 C3             ret   
   > 161D:01D7 09 C8          or           ax,cx   
   > 161D:01D9 C3             ret   
   > 161D:01DA 31 C8          xor          ax,cx   
   > 161D:01DC C3             ret   
   > 161D:01DD 21 C8          and          ax,cx   
   > 161D:01DF C3             ret   
   > 161D:01E0 F7 E1          mul          cx   
   > 161D:01E2 C3             ret   
      
   Now contemplating SMC to make all these redundant.   
   (have to drop EXP as an option)   
      
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
      
      
   --   
   Bah, and indeed, Humbug.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)