Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,410 of 4,675    |
|    Terje Mathisen to Rod Pemberton    |
|    Re: Can anyone help me with assembly lan    |
|    15 May 18 10:32:26    |
      From: terje.mathisen@nospicedham.tmsw.no              Rod Pemberton wrote:       > On Tue, 15 May 2018 07:44:33 +0200 Terje Mathisen       >> That looked like a perfectly reasonable solution?       >>       >       > A doubly-linked list as part of the solution was apparently required       > of the presumed student. To which, I said and demonstrated:       >       > "The problem is too simple to use linked lists."       >       > Of course, this is true. It is a simple problem. A doubly linked       > list is overkill. (My "simple" solution was probably overkill too.)       >       > My statement, that a linked list isn't required, seems impressive at       > first, until you realize that my provided solution failed to follow       > the directions to use a doubly linked list. ;-)       >       > Am I being too generous to myself for thinking this is rather       > insidious?              No. :-)       >       > What would happen if a teacher was initially impressed by the       > observation and creativity of the student, but later realized the       > student didn't follow the directions? (Yes, they absolutely hate       > when students don't follow the directions.)       >              Bad teachers penalize such students, good teachers reward them.              Back in high school I had one paper returned with a demerit for       inventing a better & more direct solution than the textbook version they       expected.              However, when my (really great!) math teacher went through the test on       the blackboard, he used my approach as an example showing how to get       extra credit! (He had not graded my paper obviously...)              In your original example, the really over the top solution would have       used some fancy group theory math to directly return the answer. (I       don't know if this is theoretically possible in the general case?)              Terje              --       - |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca