From: terje.mathisen@nospicedham.tmsw.no   
      
   Robert Prins wrote:   
   > On 2018-08-16 16:02, Terje Mathisen wrote:   
   >> (newsgroups limited to just clax86, my server does not allow   
   >> indiscriminate cross-posting.)   
   >>   
   >> Robert, you do realize that anything you are going to print will   
   >> take billions of cycles for every second the printer needs to   
   >> actually print the pages?   
   >   
   > Really? ROFL...   
   >   
   > Of course I do realise that once I/O is added, all bets are off. But   
   > as I've mentioned in another reply you may already have seen,   
   > sometimes others approach a problem from a completely different   
   > angle, with stunning results.   
      
   OK, here's the most obvious (?) one:   
      
   Create a function for each of these lists, put them all on an array and   
   call them in order with the current item:   
      
   Each time a list has been completed, the corresponding function pointer   
   removes itself from the array of functions to be called.   
      
   Terje   
      
   --   
   -    
   "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)