From: address@nospicedham.not.available   
      
   Alexei,   
      
   > I thought my code did that, no?   
      
   Maybe for you, but not for me (as I told you in my reply).   
      
   Rethorical question: Do you think that maybe the difference in used   
   assemblers and linkers could have something to do with it (which is why I   
   explicitily mentioned I'm (still) using Borlands Tasm and Tlink) ?   
      
   Your assembler might find it fully logical to just conjure up a "default"   
   stack when you do not declare any, mine doesn't.   
      
   And if yours doesn't do that, why than doesn't your program start with an   
   SS:SP of CS:0000 ?    And if thats so does than why aren't you understanding   
   me ?     Don't you think that that is a problem  ?   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)