Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,575 of 4,675    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: EXE program stack setup questions    |
|    13 Oct 18 16:25:25    |
      From: address@nospicedham.not.available              Steve,              > If I needed a tiny program I would just use a COM file.              You do realize that a COM style program can be put in a fragment of free       memory that is large enough for the code+data image, but not large enough       for its further uninitialized data (BSS) requirements ? That means that       you could load and start a COM style program, only to have it fail when it       tries to resize.              EXE style tiny memory models do have their perks.              And yes, I've been programing COM style programs for quite a few years now.       Normally I even initialize SP to 0100h. I mean, about 00A0h bytes of stack       should be enough for .. well, most small-style programs. :-)              Regards,       Rudy Wieser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca