Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,619 of 4,675    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: Indirect INT calling    |
|    28 Oct 18 08:14:11    |
      From: address@nospicedham.not.available              Robert,              > We always did the self-modifying code thing. It's not hard to       > make a list of those, and patch multiple locations at startup.              I guess I could try to macro the call and have it generate the list       automatically (instead of adding every reference by hand I mean)              > Some macro ... trickery can help build the list automatically as well.              Ninja-ed! :-)              > Some ... segment trickery              In regard to the offsets you mean? No need for that yet, as my programs       tend to stay in the tiny model.                     @all:       Reading the responses I take it that creating a procedure thats called       instead of performing the INT directly (meaning only one spot to modify) is       out of the question. (too many stack shennigans) ?              Regards,       Rudy Wieser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca