home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.asm.x86      Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly      4,675 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,619 of 4,675   
   R.Wieser to All   
   Re: Indirect INT calling   
   28 Oct 18 08:14:11   
   
   From: address@nospicedham.not.available   
      
   Robert,   
      
   > We always did the self-modifying code thing.  It's not hard to   
   > make a list of those, and patch multiple locations at startup.   
      
   I guess I could try to macro the call and have it generate the list   
   automatically (instead of adding every reference by hand I mean)   
      
   > Some macro ... trickery can help build the list automatically as well.   
      
   Ninja-ed! :-)   
      
   > Some ... segment trickery   
      
   In regard to the offsets you mean?   No need for that yet, as my programs   
   tend to stay in the tiny model.   
      
      
   @all:   
   Reading the responses I take it that creating a procedure thats called   
   instead of performing the INT directly (meaning only one spot to modify) is   
   out of the question. (too many stack shennigans) ?   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca