From: terje.mathisen@nospicedham.tmsw.no   
      
   R.Wieser wrote:   
   > Terje,   
   >   
   >> I thought that one was obvious [snip]   
   >   
   > It is.   And in its simplicity its rather beautiful too.   Its only   
   > drawback is that one extra stack it uses.   I was hoping for a   
   > solution which would do away with it ... and still stay as simple   
   > ofcourse.   
      
   Adding 10-100 patch locations in order to save a single word of stack space?   
      
   Before calling a driver which switches to a private stack anyway?   
      
   "You gotta be kidding!"   
   :-)   
      
   Terje   
      
   --   
   -    
   "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)