Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,652 of 4,675    |
|    wolfgang kern to R.Wieser    |
|    Re: Indirect INT calling    |
|    02 Nov 18 00:57:30    |
      From: nowhere@never.at              R.Wieser wrote:              > Wolfgang,       >> yes, of course your near CALL needs two bytes anyway              > You have not really looked at my code, haven't you ? :-(              I saw that you fiddle the return into... so yes this are only       6 byte on stack, but your code access the stack eight times,       which I see as a waste in size and speed, just to save one       byte for the return and two bytes on stack.              what's your reason to have only 6 instead of 8 ?       __       wolfgang              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca