Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,724 of 4,675    |
|    Rick C. Hodgin to Alex McDonald    |
|    Re: String literals in asm source code    |
|    31 Dec 18 03:22:38    |
      From: rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com              On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 6:04:38 AM UTC-5, Alex McDonald wrote:       > On 30-Dec-18 23:31, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:       > > My advice is if you need true readability, create a tool that will       > > allow you to write source code in a nice format, and then translate       > > your source code to a form that is conducive to the needs of the CPU       > > you're writing code for.       > >       > > Make it look the way you'd like to see it, but then have the tool       > > translate it to the needs of the machine.       > >       >       > In other words, use an assembler or compiler with good programmer       > facilities...              Sort of. I assume if the tools he has work adequately to his needs       or tastes he wouldn't be askimg the question.              I assume a different, custom desire, one which requires a type of       compiler that takes the syntax he desires, and translates it to       the needs of the assembler.              --       Rick C. Hodgin              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca