Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,850 of 4,675    |
|    Terje Mathisen to George Neuner    |
|    Re: x86 memory testing - dealing with ca    |
|    08 Apr 19 07:28:49    |
      From: terje.mathisen@nospicedham.tmsw.no              George Neuner wrote:       > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:08:30 +0200, Terje Mathisen       >> the problem       >> is that when it comes back on (automatically) it has also forgotten that       >> the tail surface as already been depressed, so as soon as it gets       >> another bad reading from the broken angle of attack sensor it will send       >> additional commands to further depress it, increasing the problem.       >       > Interesting ... that I hadn't heard. That would be quickly fatal       > because the tail depresses 10 degrees with each activation. Beyond 40       > degrees the attitude would be unrecoverable below ~10K ft.              I think that is wrong:              In the early stages, and in the papers sent to the FAA (?), the maximum       MCAS trim was supposed to be a 0.6 degree adjustment, but when this       turned out to be insufficient it was raised to 5 degrees. This last       value is well above what a slight pull on the yoke can correct for, right?              Terje              --       - |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca