Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,034 of 4,675    |
|    Ned Latham to Frank Kotler    |
|    Re: Manual for current MASM    |
|    03 Apr 20 00:19:16    |
      From: nedlatham@nospicedham.woden.valhalla.oz              Frank Kotler wrote:       > Melzzzzz wrote:              > > > You have plenty of assemblers nowadays which are better then masm.       > > > I use nasm and fasm.       > >       > > What's besser than MASM ?       >       > :) :) :)       >       > As moderator, I really should point out that "My assembler is better       > than your assembler" is really not on topic here... (differences are okay)              Or comments on quality?              Back in 1994 a year 2 assigment was to write an automaton in assembler.       They gave us three weeks and MASM, EDIT (or was it EDLIN?) and some M$       system calls to work with. The editor and the asembler were pathetic.              I mean they were both *really* bad. And the system calls were slo-o-o-w.              So after nine days of struggling with those grossly inadequate tools       I spat the dummy. Got onto usenet looking for some help. Found PC-Write       and a86. Also did a bit of checking on the IBM PC BIOS.              Rewrote the assigment using those tools and info. Finished ahead of       time and got 110/100 for it.              What's better than MASM? a86. Streets ahead.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca