Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,130 of 4,675    |
|    olcott to Frank Kotler    |
|    Re: Mapping x86/x64/C to a Turing equiva    |
|    06 Sep 20 00:17:07    |
      From: NoOne@nospicedham.NoWhere.com              On 9/5/2020 11:50 PM, Frank Kotler wrote:       > On 09/05/2020 03:06 PM, Terje Mathisen wrote:       >> Please, no more!       >>       >> Turing-complete "C" has absolutely _nothing_ to do with       >> comp.lang.asm.x86, and does not belong here. :-(       >       > I fear I made an error on approving this in the first place. I saw a       > reference to "x86" and thought "well maybe..." But we are not about C       > here... Hopefully it will die put quietly...       >       > Best,       > Frank       > [moderator]       >       >              No one here seems to care about how x86/x64 computations are Turing       equivalent. I created an Universal Turing Machine (UTM) equivalent that       has the x86 language as its description language.              --       Copyright 2020 Pete Olcott              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca