Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,244 of 4,675    |
|    Frank Kotler to Terje Mathisen    |
|    Re: Moderation issues - was Re: Refuting    |
|    20 Dec 20 23:07:46    |
      From: fbkotler@nospicedham.myfairpoint.net              On 12/20/2020 04:40 PM, Terje Mathisen wrote:              ...       > This seems like a no-brainer:       >       > Three lists:       >       > White - pass through automatically.              This is what I've got. I'm thinking of changing the name to       karenlist" so it won't be so racist (joke).              > Grey - require manual approval,              This is everything else.              increment good/bad counters until N       > messages. Here I would guess that N = 3 is sufficient as long as they       > are all of the same type. Maybe require something like       >       > (good >= 3) && ((good-bad)/all > 0.8)       >              ???              > Black - remove automatically              With one exception, I do not automatically reject anything. When I first       got into this, there were many messages - several per day - with the       word "Viagra" in the subject line. Those I rejected. Doesn't happen any       more - there are very few "bad" messages. I don't know why. Once in a       while, a long (50k or more) "binary" (no regular linefeeds) message       named "Confirmation of your order" or so. Malware, I assume. Only a few       that want to sell us a fake watch or a fake diploma. An occasional gal       who has seen our profile and wants to be our girlfriend... Used to be       much more... I can't predict the names. so can't have a "blacklist". I       just delete 'em by hand,              > A former good poster who starts spamming would then be given an email       > warning and moved to the grey list with initial good/bad counts of 0/0.              I think there is only one individual who has been permanently removed       from the whitelist. (not Rick - he is very cooperative!). He was       insulting to a member (Rod). If he'd posted something on-topic_he would       have been back on, but he just wanted to argue with me. There is no       point in arguing with a moderator... you might be right, but you won't       win. :)              Then there are certain messages from Pete, which are - at least       sometimes - "sorta" on-topic or "almost" on-topic. but which we don't       seem to want to see here. I'm hoping I can leave Pete on the whitelist       and ask him not to post them here and ask the rest of us to be tolerant.        One way or another I hope it'll work out...              Best,       Frank              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca