From: nowhere@nospicedham.never.at   
      
   On 08.08.2021 13:35, R.Wieser wrote:   
      
   >> so I'd recommend either   
   > ...   
   >> or shorter   
   >>     0F AE 00        FXSAVE [bx+si]  (ditto)   
      
   > For testing purposes I tend to go with the most basic one first, so I took   
   > that one.   
   > Remark: I'm on XP 32 bit, so the registers are EBX and ESI respectivily.   
   >   
   > Alas, same problem : crash.   
   >   
   > Aligning [EBX+ESI] on a 64 byte boundary (as suggested by robert prins) did   
   > not make a difference.   
   >   
   > I'm starting to lean towards the possibility that the command is refused   
   > (does not exist). Is there any way to check it ?   
      
   look up CPUID, one of the returned bits tell if present or not.   
   __   
   wolfgang   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)