Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,579 of 4,675    |
|    Paul Edwards to Paul Edwards    |
|    Re: serial port    |
|    15 Apr 23 05:44:53    |
      From: mutazilah@nospicedham.gmail.com              On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 5:36:19 PM UTC+8, Paul Edwards wrote:              > > uartEnableTBE(&uart);              So far I have confirmed that after I have issued this       (but without installing my own interrupt handler),       I can read the uart to find out what interrupts are       available and I see that TBE is the only one.              I think transmit a byte, and I do get an interrupt,       so I do get an additional interrupt even though       I've read all the previous ones.              Then when I go through for the second time, enabling       TBE does the same thing, and I read the same thing       from the uart.              But this time when I try to transmit a byte I either don't       get an interrupt or I get a hang for some other reason.              So I don't know what is going on.              If I can get consistent behavior I can have a simple design.              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca