Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.asm.x86    |    Ahh, the lost art of x86 assembly    |    4,675 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,599 of 4,675    |
|    Tavis Ormandy to Tavis Ormandy    |
|    Re: ss and lea on 8086    |
|    24 Jun 23 15:39:49    |
      From: taviso@nospicedham.gmail.com              On 2023-06-24, Tavis Ormandy wrote:       >> I've been looking at this for hours.       >>       >> Unless I've somehow stuffed up the test, this data is       >> all being set to 'P'.       >       > I don't follow, you set buf[3] to 'R' (shows as OFFSET 82 in the       > disassembly) and buf[4] to 'S'.              Ah, as soon as I hit send I realized what you were saying - you don't       think there's a miscompilation. You're saying the write to ss:[bx] isn't       working, and you suspect the lea is to blame?              It seems correct to me, the base should be irrelevant and the actual       write has the correct override. I don't know what could be causing       that!              Tavis.                     --        _o) $ lynx lock.cmpxchg8b.com        /\\ _o) _o) $ finger taviso@sdf.org       _\_V _( ) _( ) @taviso              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca