Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,035 of 2,753    |
|    Everett M. Greene to All    |
|    Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re:    |
|    17 Aug 07 08:15:49    |
      From: mojaveg@mojaveg.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com              > Until that new compiler, IBM pretty much entirely ignored ANSI PL/I,       > which is semantically very incompatible with IBM's original definition       > of the language.              I would like to see some indication of how IBM PL/I was "very       incompatible" with the ANSI version given that the ANSI spec was       derived from IBM's internal spec for the language.       [The ANSI standard is phenomenally hard to read because of all of the       formalisms. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the differences were       due to misunderstandings about what all the formal goop actually       meant. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca