Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,039 of 2,753    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= to All    |
|    Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re:    |
|    21 Aug 07 11:09:28    |
      XPost: comp.lang.pl1       From: jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de              Our esteemed moderator commented:       > [Fortran has backward compatibility issues going back to the 1950s.              Sure enough.              > You've always been able to pass any array element as an argument by       > address, and it's up to your code to get the array shapes       > right. The only descriptors are the lengths of character variables introduced       > in F77. -John]              Hmmm....for the current version of Fortran, that isn't true. Assumed shape       array - introduced some fifteen years ago in F90 - need to transport shape       information that is equivalent to a "descriptor". So do allocatable arrays and       array pointers.               Jan       [Oh, right. It's been a while. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca