Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,058 of 2,753    |
|    Joachim Durchholz to Jeff Kenton    |
|    Re: "Circumfix" operators    |
|    13 Sep 07 07:45:19    |
      From: jo@durchholz.org              Jeff Kenton schrieb:       > As for if-then-else, I wouldn't add them to expression parsing unless       > they are really valid in expressions, as they were in Algol or are now       > in Xpath.              That's indeed what I'm after.               > Otherwise, I'd use a recursive descent parser for most of the       > language and switch to operator precedence parsing just for expressions.              The goal is to have an all-operators language. Well, just syntactically,       so it's really going to be an all-operator-precedence language :-)              Regards,       Jo       [You know, if we want BLISS, we know where to find it. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca