Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.compilers    |    Compiler construction, theory, etc. (Mod    |    2,753 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,066 of 2,753    |
|    Hans-Peter Diettrich to Louis Krupp    |
|    Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack     |
|    13 Sep 07 22:45:45    |
      From: DrDiettrich1@aol.com              Louis Krupp wrote:              > I do know that the earlier machines in this series (Burroughs B6700)       > kept the top two words of the stack (and their double precision       > extensions) in registers and the rest of the stack in memory. Later       > machines cached the top n words of the stack, which made stack access       > faster.              AFAIR a 16 bit TI microprocessor also used the top 16 entries on the       stack as registers. Perhaps this architecture reflected the Burroughs       machine?              DoDi       [That seems to be pretty typical. The HP3000 kept the top several elements       of the stack in registers as well. -John]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca